Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Atsushi Iimi (2007)
Estimating Global Climate Change Impacts on Hydropower Projects: Applications in India, Sri Lanka and VietnamAgricultural & Natural Resource Economics
(2001)
The Nuclear Option Revisited.
J. Deutch, E. Moniz
A Future for Fossil Fuel
(1998)
Severe Accidents in the Energy Sector: Report on Externalities of Power Production
R. Schock, N. Brown, C. Smith (2001)
Nuclear Power, Small Nuclear Technology, and the Role of Technical Innovation: An Assessment
(2007)
Stabilization Wedges: A Concept & Game
(2007)
US-Japan Workshop on Climate Actions and Development Co-benefits
P. Joskow, J. Parsons (2009)
The economic future of nuclear powerDaedalus, 138
(2004)
“ What is the Cost of Not Having Nuclear Power or Carbon Capture and Storage While Still Stabilizing GHG Concentrations at Safe Levels ?
Robert Graber, G. Rothwell (2006)
Valuation and optionality of large energy industry capital investmentsCost engineering, 48
(2005)
Building New Nuclear Plants to Cost and Schedule: An International Perspective.
(2008)
Can Future Nuclear Power Be Made Proliferation Resistant?
A. Bartle (2002)
Hydropower potential and development activitiesEnergy Policy, 30
P. Joskow (2006)
The future of nuclear power in the United States : economic and regulatory challenges
J. Dooley, J. Edmonds, R. Dahowski, M. Wise (2003)
Modeling Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies in Energy and Economic Models
J. Ullmann (1958)
Economics of Nuclear Power.Science, 128 3315
Andrew Stirling (2001)
Science and precaution in the appraisal of electricity supply options.Journal of hazardous materials, 86 1-3
F. Roques, W. Nuttall, D. Newbery, R. Neufville, S. Connors (2006)
Nuclear Power: A Hedge against Uncertain Gas and Carbon Prices?The Energy Journal, 27
(2003)
Energy Security and Diversity in the EU: A Mean-Variance Portfolio Approach.
(2007)
Privatization and Financial Collapse in the Nuclear Industry; The Origins and Causes of the British Energy crisis
J. Baker (2001)
SMALL INNOVATIVE REACTOR DESIGNS - USEFUL ATTRIBUTES AND STATUS OF TECHNOLOGY
L. Clarke, J. Edmonds, H. Jacoby, J. Reilly, R. Richels (2007)
Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations
(2006)
European Citizens’ Opinions Towards Radioactive Waste: An Updated Review,
Wolf-J. Schmidt-Küster (2000)
The future of nuclear energy in Europe, 45
(2006)
Advanced Nuclear Reactors: Their Use in Future Energy Supply.
B. Frois (2005)
Advances in Nuclear EnergyNuclear Physics, 752
M. Festing, E. Fisher (2000)
Mighty miceNature, 404
H. Rogner (2010)
Nuclear Power and Sustainable DevelopmentJournal of International Affairs, 64
P. Gokhale, Sangeeta Deokattey, Vijai Kumar (2006)
Accelerator driven systems (ADS) for energy production and waste transmutation : International trends in R&DProgress in Nuclear Energy, 48
Matthew Wald (2008)
Can Nuclear Power CompeteScientific American, 18
(2004)
Nuclear Plants may be Clean Hydrogen Source.
(2007)
“ Backgrounder on New Nuclear Plant Designs . ”
N. Mortimer (1991)
Nuclear power and global warmingEnergy Policy, 19
V. Sundström (2009)
Solar energy conversion.Dalton transactions, 45
S. Pacala, R. Socolow (2004)
Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current TechnologiesScience, 305
P. James (1982)
The future of coal
Stephen Thomas, Peter Bradford, A. Froggatt, D. Milborrow (2007)
The economics of nuclear power
(2007)
“ Managing the Transition to Climate Change . ” Working Paper 0701 , American Enterprise Institute - Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies
Marc Schattenmann (2000)
IAEA – International Atomic Energy AgencyA Concise Encyclopedia of the United Nations
C. Archer, M. Jacobson (2005)
Evaluation of global wind powerJournal of Geophysical Research, 110
D. MacIsaac (2009)
Sustainable Energy — Without the hot airThe Physics Teacher, 47
(2008)
The Union of Concerned Scientists
P. Joskow (2005)
Markets for Power in the United States: An Interim AssessmentIO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal
G. Rothwell (2006)
A real options approach to-evaluating new nuclear power plantsThe Energy Journal, 27
A. Brolly, P. Vértes (2005)
Concept of a small-scale electron accelerator driven system for nuclear waste transmutation: Part 2. Investigation of burnupAnnals of Nuclear Energy, 32
I. Gorst (1985)
Survey of energy resourcesPetroleum economist, 42
M. Thring (1977)
World Energy OutlookElectronics and Power, 23
D. Finon, F. Roques (2008)
Financing Arrangements and Industrial Organisation for New Nuclear Build in Electricity MarketsCompetition and Regulation in Network Industries, 9
J. Bartis, F. Camm, David Ortiz (2008)
Producing Liquid Fuels from Coal: Prospects and Policy Issues
(2004)
Levelized Unit Electricity Cost Comparison of Alternate Technologies for Baseload Generation in Ontario
S. Ireland (2009)
Energy Prices and Taxes
(2001)
New Energy Technologies: A Policy Framework for Micronuclear Technology.
F. Rahn, A. Adamantiades, J. Kenton, C. Braun (1984)
Guide to nuclear power technology
(2006)
Chernobyl’s Legacy: Health, Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts
T. Hegazy (2006)
Simplified project management for Construction practitionersCost engineering, 48
(2006)
“ Chernobyl Death Toll Grossly Underestimated
R. Cantor, J. Hewlett (1988)
The economics of nuclear power: Further evidence on learning, economies of scale, and regulatory effectsResources and Energy, 10
H. Hampel, A. Kienlin (1973)
Supply of uranium
B. Kursunoglu, S. Mintz, A. Perlmutter (2001)
Global warming and energy policy
The author examines the challenges and opportunities of nuclear power in meeting the projected large absolute increase in energy demand, especially electricity, throughout the industrialized and developing world, while helping to mitigate the threat of climate change. A significant global nuclear power deployment would engender serious risks related to proliferation, safety, and waste disposal. Unlike renewable sources of energy, nuclear power is an unforgiving technology because human lapses and errors can have ecological and social impacts that are catastrophic and irreversible. However, according to some analysts, advances in the design of nuclear reactors may have reduced their associated risks and improved their performance. Moreover, while a variety of renewable energy sources (hydro, wind, modern biomass, solar) will play important roles in the transition to a low-carbon economy, some analysts perceive that nuclear power is the only proven technology for generating electricity that is both largely carbon-free, not location specific (as with wind, hydro and solar), and amenable to significant scaling up. Thus given the projections of threats from climate change, and if the considerable strain experienced by world energy markets in recent years is a harbinger of things to come, then there is a rationale for examining the pros and cons of nuclear power as a supply option within low-carbon strategies. It should be noted that despite the emerging centrality of climate change and security of supply in the energy policy debate, nuclear power is still viewed with a great deal of skepticism and in fact continues to elicit considerable opposition. Indeed the views on nuclear power in the context of sustainable energy policy are highly divergent. A thorough evaluation of all aspects of the issue is warranted.
The World Bank Research Observer – Oxford University Press
Published: Aug 30, 2010
Keywords: JEL codes L52 L54 L94 L97 L98
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.