Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Optimal Estimation of the Risk Premium for the Long Run and Asset Allocation: A Case of Compounded Estimation Risk

Optimal Estimation of the Risk Premium for the Long Run and Asset Allocation: A Case of... It is well known that an unbiased forecast of the terminal value of a portfolio requires compounding at the arithmetic mean return over the investment horizon. However, the maximum-likelihood practice, common with academics, of compounding at the estimator of mean return results in upward biased and highly inefficient estimates of long-term expected returns. We derive analytically both an unbiased and a small-sample efficient estimator of long-term expected returns for a given sample size and horizon. Both estimators entail penalties that reduce the annual compounding rate as the investment horizon increases. The unbiased estimator, which is far lower than the compounded arithmetic average, is still very inefficient, often more so than a simple geometric estimator known to practitioners. Our small-sample efficient estimator is even lower. These results compound the sobering evidence in recent work that the equity risk premium is lower than suggested by post-1926 data. Our methodology and results are robust to extensions such as predictable returns. We also confirm analytically that parameter uncertainty, properly incorporated, produces optimal asset allocations, in stark contrast to conventional wisdom. Longer investment horizons require lower, not higher, allocations to risky assets. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Financial Econometrics Oxford University Press

Optimal Estimation of the Risk Premium for the Long Run and Asset Allocation: A Case of Compounded Estimation Risk

Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/optimal-estimation-of-the-risk-premium-for-the-long-run-and-asset-0yTaOXCoW4

References (27)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
Journal of Financial Econometrics, Vol. 3, No. 1, © Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved.
ISSN
1479-8409
eISSN
1479-8417
DOI
10.1093/jjfinec/nbi001
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

It is well known that an unbiased forecast of the terminal value of a portfolio requires compounding at the arithmetic mean return over the investment horizon. However, the maximum-likelihood practice, common with academics, of compounding at the estimator of mean return results in upward biased and highly inefficient estimates of long-term expected returns. We derive analytically both an unbiased and a small-sample efficient estimator of long-term expected returns for a given sample size and horizon. Both estimators entail penalties that reduce the annual compounding rate as the investment horizon increases. The unbiased estimator, which is far lower than the compounded arithmetic average, is still very inefficient, often more so than a simple geometric estimator known to practitioners. Our small-sample efficient estimator is even lower. These results compound the sobering evidence in recent work that the equity risk premium is lower than suggested by post-1926 data. Our methodology and results are robust to extensions such as predictable returns. We also confirm analytically that parameter uncertainty, properly incorporated, produces optimal asset allocations, in stark contrast to conventional wisdom. Longer investment horizons require lower, not higher, allocations to risky assets.

Journal

Journal of Financial Econometrics – Oxford University Press

Published: Jan 1, 2005

There are no references for this article.