Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Kennedy (1964)
Induced Bias in Innovation and the Theory of DistributionThe Economic Journal, 74
Creating a Learning Society: A New Paradigm For Development and Social Progress
R. Solow (1957)
TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTIONThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 39
J. Lin, Gary Becker, Otaviano Canuto, Ha-Joon Chang, Luiz Pereira, Da Silva, A. Torre, Christian Delvoie, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt, S. Devarajan, Hinh Dinh, Shahrokh Fardoust, Ariel Fiszbein, R. Fogel, A. Gelb, I. Gill, A. Harrison, James Heckman, Aart Kraay, A. Kouame, Norman Loayza, F. Lysy, S. Makki, Mustapha Maloney, Kamel Nabli, Vikram Nehru, Howard Pack, N. Piffaretti, C. Sepulveda, M. Ravallion, M. MohammadZia, Sergio Qureshi, Luis Schmukler, Serven Harald, Uhlig (2010)
New Structural Economics A Framework for Rethinking Development
W. Fellner (1961)
Two Propositions in the Theory of Induced InnovationsThe Economic Journal, 71
Michael Szenberg, Lall Ramrattan, Aron Gottesman (2006)
Samuelsonian Economics and the Twenty‐First CenturyJournal of Management History, 16
C. Freeman, W. Nordhaus (1969)
Invention, Growth, and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change by William D. Nordhaus (review)Technology and Culture, 12
J. Stiglitz, Amartya Sen, Jean-Paul Fitoussi, Nicolas Sarkozy (2010)
Mismeasuring our lives : why GDP doesn't add up : the report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress
J. Anjaria (1971)
Strategy of economic development
B. Greenwald, J. Stiglitz (2006)
Helping Infant Economies Grow: Foundations of Trade Policies for Developing CountriesThe American Economic Review, 96
K. Arrow (1962)
The Economic Implications of Learning by DoingThe Review of Economic Studies, 29
W. Nordhaus (1969)
An Economic Theory of Technological ChangeThe American Economic Review, 59
A. Atkinson, J. Stiglitz (1969)
A New View of Technological ChangeThe Economic Journal, 79
J. Stiglitz (1987)
Economic policy and technological performance: Learning to learn, localized learning and technological progress
World Bank (2011)
Journal of Globalization and Development Dysfunctional Finance : Positive Shocks and Negative Outcomes
J. Stiglitz (2006)
Samuelson and the Factor Bias of Technological Change: Toward a Unified Theory of Growth and Unemployment
P. Dasgupta, Paul Stoneman (1987)
Economic policy and technological performance
K. Hoff, J. Stiglitz (2010)
Working Paper 5219 Equilibrium Fictions A Cognitive Approach to Societal Rigidity
Karl Shell (2010)
Toward A Theory of Inventive Activity and Capital Accumulation
Working paper, Institute for International Economic Policy Working Paper Series Elliott School of International Affairs The George Washington University
P. Dasgupta, J. Stiglitz (1980)
Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative ActivityThe Economic Journal, 90
(1999)
World Development Report 1998–99: Knowledge for Development . New York: Oxford University Press 236
Jean-Paul Fitoussi, Amartya Sen, J. Stiglitz (2011)
Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress
R. Hausmann, D. Rodrik (2002)
Economic Development as Self-DiscoveryMacroeconomics eJournal
J. Stiglitz (2002)
Towards a New Paradigm for Development: Strategies, Policies and ProcessesApplied Econometrics and International Development, 2
The World Bank Development Research Group Macroeconomics and Growth Team
A. Vandendorpe, Karl Shell (1968)
Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth.Journal of Finance, 23
M. Emran, J. Stiglitz (2009)
Financial Liberalization, Financial Restraint, and Entrepreneurial DevelopmentSocial Entrepreneurship eJournal
P. Dasgupta, J. Stiglitz (1980)
Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&DThe Bell Journal of Economics, 11
H. Uzawa, K. Arrow (1965)
Preference, production, and capital: Optimum technical change in an aggregative model of economic growthInternational Economic Review, 6
Joseph E. Stiglitz Twelve years ago, when I was chief economist of the World Bank, I suggested that the major challenge to development economics was learning the lessons of the previous several decades: a small group of countries, mostly in Asia, but a few in other regions, had had phenomenal success, beyond anything that had been anticipated by economists; while many other countries had experienced slow growth, or even worse, stagnation and decline—inconsistent with the standard models in economics which predicted convergence. The successful countries had followed policies that were markedly different from those of the Washington Consensus, though they shared some elements in common; those policies had not brought high growth, stability, or poverty reduction. Shortly after I left the World Bank, the crisis in Argentina—which had been held up as the poster child of the country that had followed Washington Consensus policies—reinforced the doubts about that strategy. The global financial crisis, too, has cast doubt over the neoclassical paradigm in advanced industrial countries, and rightly so. Much of development economics had been viewed as asking how developing countries could successfully transition toward the kinds of market-oriented policy frameworks that came to be called “American style capitalism.” The
The World Bank Research Observer – Oxford University Press
Published: Aug 19, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.