Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
BOOKS REVIEWED SOCIAL ORDER AND THE LIMITS OF LAW: A THEORETICAL ESSAY By Iredell Jenkins. Princeton University Press, 1980 No, I venture to say that in the entire contemporary literature in the philosophy of law there just isn't any book that is quite comparable in achievement to this remarkable performance by Professor Iredell Jenkins! For consider: is it not simply a fact, and without my being in any way in- vidious in saying so, that most of the recent major works in the philosophy of law have been nothing if not somewhat circumscribed? Even Professor Hart, as something of a legal positivist, but still one who has manifestly emerged from the positivist cocoon—of him may it not be said that he has been largely content with making his fundamental distinction between pri- mary rules and secondary rules, and yet without perhaps concerning himself overmuch with what natural or societal or philosophical warrant and justifica- tion there might be for such rules? Likewise, Professor Fuller could write a book entitled The Morality of Law, and yet not speak either too directly or too meaningfully to the very people who go by the name of moral philosophers. Still more recently, Ronald
American Journal of Jurisprudence – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 1980
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.