Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Right to Health: Why It Should Apply to Immigrants

The Right to Health: Why It Should Apply to Immigrants Although the right to health is universal, many nations that honor it fail to do so in the case of non-citizen immigrants. In this essay, we argue that the reasons typically given for not extending the right to health to immigrants are without merit and that there are good reasons for nations to protect, respect and fulfill the health right of all immigrants. Contrary to the standard view, we argue that health can be understood as a global public good. Two important points follow: (i) because health is non-excludable and non-rivalrous, it is in the health interests of nations to respect, protect and fulfill immigrants right to health. Furthermore, (ii) meeting the health needs of immigrants is an important way for receiving nations to meet the duties that may be generated by the benefits they incur as a result of healths global public good dimension, thus ensuring that receiving nations are not free riders. We then argue that because citizens and immigrants dwell together, nations have duties of solidarity to immigrants with respect to health. Using the insights of social psychology, we show that solidarity among diverse people (citizens and non-citizens) is both a reasonable expectation and a morally desirable one. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Public Health Ethics Oxford University Press

The Right to Health: Why It Should Apply to Immigrants

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/the-right-to-health-why-it-should-apply-to-immigrants-BN6vBITfVy

References (33)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. Available online at www.phe.oxfordjournals.org
ISSN
1754-9973
eISSN
1754-9981
DOI
10.1093/phe/phv007
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Although the right to health is universal, many nations that honor it fail to do so in the case of non-citizen immigrants. In this essay, we argue that the reasons typically given for not extending the right to health to immigrants are without merit and that there are good reasons for nations to protect, respect and fulfill the health right of all immigrants. Contrary to the standard view, we argue that health can be understood as a global public good. Two important points follow: (i) because health is non-excludable and non-rivalrous, it is in the health interests of nations to respect, protect and fulfill immigrants right to health. Furthermore, (ii) meeting the health needs of immigrants is an important way for receiving nations to meet the duties that may be generated by the benefits they incur as a result of healths global public good dimension, thus ensuring that receiving nations are not free riders. We then argue that because citizens and immigrants dwell together, nations have duties of solidarity to immigrants with respect to health. Using the insights of social psychology, we show that solidarity among diverse people (citizens and non-citizens) is both a reasonable expectation and a morally desirable one.

Journal

Public Health EthicsOxford University Press

Published: Jul 20, 2015

There are no references for this article.