Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Subscribe now for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Development and validation of a patient needs assessment tool (PNAT) for oncology clinicians.

Development and validation of a patient needs assessment tool (PNAT) for oncology clinicians. The Patient Needs Assessment Tool (PNAT) is an interviewer-rated scale that may be completed through a simple structured interview and screens cancer patients for potential problems in physical and psychosocial functioning. The instrument provides separate scores for physical, psychological, and social status, and can potentially clarify the types of interventions needed to address specific areas of dysfunction. Reliability and validity was tested in two studies that used prescreened patient videotapes and other materials to assess the performance of the PNAT in groups of oncology nurses, physicians, and social workers. The data demonstrate that subscale scores for the physical, psychological, and social dimensions have good inter-rater reliability and internal consistency (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.71-0.97). Criterion and construct validity was suggested through high correlations of each subscale with the evaluation of expert raters (correlation coefficients of 0.85-0.95) and with scores on validated patient-rated instruments appropriate to the functional area. These analyses suggest that the PNAT is a valid scale for the assessment of a range of functional disturbances in the cancer population. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Cancer nursing Pubmed

Development and validation of a patient needs assessment tool (PNAT) for oncology clinicians.

Cancer nursing , Volume 19 (2): 12 – Jul 10, 1996

Development and validation of a patient needs assessment tool (PNAT) for oncology clinicians.


Abstract

The Patient Needs Assessment Tool (PNAT) is an interviewer-rated scale that may be completed through a simple structured interview and screens cancer patients for potential problems in physical and psychosocial functioning. The instrument provides separate scores for physical, psychological, and social status, and can potentially clarify the types of interventions needed to address specific areas of dysfunction. Reliability and validity was tested in two studies that used prescreened patient videotapes and other materials to assess the performance of the PNAT in groups of oncology nurses, physicians, and social workers. The data demonstrate that subscale scores for the physical, psychological, and social dimensions have good inter-rater reliability and internal consistency (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.71-0.97). Criterion and construct validity was suggested through high correlations of each subscale with the evaluation of expert raters (correlation coefficients of 0.85-0.95) and with scores on validated patient-rated instruments appropriate to the functional area. These analyses suggest that the PNAT is a valid scale for the assessment of a range of functional disturbances in the cancer population.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/pubmed/development-and-validation-of-a-patient-needs-assessment-tool-pnat-for-z5ucxRLm8q

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

ISSN
0162-220X
DOI
10.1097/00002820-199604000-00001
pmid
8635168

Abstract

The Patient Needs Assessment Tool (PNAT) is an interviewer-rated scale that may be completed through a simple structured interview and screens cancer patients for potential problems in physical and psychosocial functioning. The instrument provides separate scores for physical, psychological, and social status, and can potentially clarify the types of interventions needed to address specific areas of dysfunction. Reliability and validity was tested in two studies that used prescreened patient videotapes and other materials to assess the performance of the PNAT in groups of oncology nurses, physicians, and social workers. The data demonstrate that subscale scores for the physical, psychological, and social dimensions have good inter-rater reliability and internal consistency (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.71-0.97). Criterion and construct validity was suggested through high correlations of each subscale with the evaluation of expert raters (correlation coefficients of 0.85-0.95) and with scores on validated patient-rated instruments appropriate to the functional area. These analyses suggest that the PNAT is a valid scale for the assessment of a range of functional disturbances in the cancer population.

Journal

Cancer nursingPubmed

Published: Jul 10, 1996

There are no references for this article.