Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction.

Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar... A comparative analysis of paraspinal muscle damage and radiographic parameters after mini-open and conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Spine Pubmed

Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction.

Spine , Volume 34 (18): -1914 – Jan 12, 2010

Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction.


Abstract

A comparative analysis of paraspinal muscle damage and radiographic parameters after mini-open and conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

Loading next page...
 
/lp/pubmed/mini-open-versus-conventional-open-posterior-lumbar-interbody-fusion-PDpogKq1nz

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

ISSN
0362-2436
DOI
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a9d28e
pmid
19652636

Abstract

A comparative analysis of paraspinal muscle damage and radiographic parameters after mini-open and conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

Journal

SpinePubmed

Published: Jan 12, 2010

There are no references for this article.