Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Subscribe now for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals.

The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals. Most people love animals and love eating meat. One way of reducing this conflict is to deny that animals suffer and have moral rights. We suggest that the act of categorizing an animal as 'food' may diminish their perceived capacity to suffer, which in turn dampens our moral concern. Participants were asked to read about an animal in a distant nation and we manipulated whether the animal was categorized as food, whether it was killed, and human responsibility for its death. The results demonstrate that categorization as food - but not killing or human responsibility - was sufficient to reduce the animal's perceived capacity to suffer, which in turn restricted moral concern. People may be able to love animals and love meat because animals categorized as food are seen as insensitive to pain and unworthy of moral consideration. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Appetite Pubmed

The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals.

Appetite , Volume 57 (1): -186 – Oct 24, 2011

The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals.


Abstract

Most people love animals and love eating meat. One way of reducing this conflict is to deny that animals suffer and have moral rights. We suggest that the act of categorizing an animal as 'food' may diminish their perceived capacity to suffer, which in turn dampens our moral concern. Participants were asked to read about an animal in a distant nation and we manipulated whether the animal was categorized as food, whether it was killed, and human responsibility for its death. The results demonstrate that categorization as food - but not killing or human responsibility - was sufficient to reduce the animal's perceived capacity to suffer, which in turn restricted moral concern. People may be able to love animals and love meat because animals categorized as food are seen as insensitive to pain and unworthy of moral consideration.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/pubmed/the-effect-of-categorization-as-food-on-the-perceived-moral-standing-KoFVO5KvLV

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

ISSN
0195-6663
DOI
10.1016/j.appet.2011.04.020
pmid
21569805

Abstract

Most people love animals and love eating meat. One way of reducing this conflict is to deny that animals suffer and have moral rights. We suggest that the act of categorizing an animal as 'food' may diminish their perceived capacity to suffer, which in turn dampens our moral concern. Participants were asked to read about an animal in a distant nation and we manipulated whether the animal was categorized as food, whether it was killed, and human responsibility for its death. The results demonstrate that categorization as food - but not killing or human responsibility - was sufficient to reduce the animal's perceived capacity to suffer, which in turn restricted moral concern. People may be able to love animals and love meat because animals categorized as food are seen as insensitive to pain and unworthy of moral consideration.

Journal

AppetitePubmed

Published: Oct 24, 2011

References