Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

CT Colonography without Cathartic Preparation: Feasibility Study1

CT Colonography without Cathartic Preparation: Feasibility Study1 PURPOSE: To evaluate methods for contrast material labeling of stool in the unprepared colon for computed tomographic (CT) colonography and to determine their sensitivity for polyp detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with suspected or known polyps were assigned to five groups. Two to seven doses of 225 mL of dilute contrast material were orally administered during 24 or 48 hours. Transverse CT images were assessed for effectiveness of stool labeling. Colonoscopy was performed in all patients and was the standard. Two radiologists blinded to prior imaging and colonoscopic results assessed polyp detection. RESULTS: For each group, average stool labeling scores and ranges were as follows: 24 hour two dose, 16% and 8%–21%; 24 hour five dose, 53% and 27%–66%; 48 hour four dose, 38% and 22%–48%; 48 hour six dose, 68% and 54%–77%; and 48 hour seven dose, 88% and 75%–98%. Sensitivity for the two radiologists for the identification of patients with polyps 1 cm or larger for each group was as follows: 24 hour two dose, 50% and 67%; 24 hour five dose, 100% and 100%; 48 hour four dose, 58% and 75%; 48 hour six dose, 56% and 67%; and 48 hour seven dose, 100% and 80%. CONCLUSION: Ingestion of contrast material adequately labels stool for lesion identification; a 48-hour lead time and multiple doses of contrast material are required. Sensitivity for polyp detection in patients with adequate stool labeling approaches the sensitivity for polyp detection in prepared colons. Colon, CT, 75.12115, 75.12143, 75.1283 Colon neoplasms, 75.30 Computed tomography (CT), contrast media, 75.12115, 75.12143, 75.1283 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Radiology Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/radiological-society-of-north-america-inc/ct-colonography-without-cathartic-preparation-feasibility-study1-gkPFjIRmJq

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by Radiological Society of North America
ISSN
1527-1315
eISSN
0033-8419
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate methods for contrast material labeling of stool in the unprepared colon for computed tomographic (CT) colonography and to determine their sensitivity for polyp detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with suspected or known polyps were assigned to five groups. Two to seven doses of 225 mL of dilute contrast material were orally administered during 24 or 48 hours. Transverse CT images were assessed for effectiveness of stool labeling. Colonoscopy was performed in all patients and was the standard. Two radiologists blinded to prior imaging and colonoscopic results assessed polyp detection. RESULTS: For each group, average stool labeling scores and ranges were as follows: 24 hour two dose, 16% and 8%–21%; 24 hour five dose, 53% and 27%–66%; 48 hour four dose, 38% and 22%–48%; 48 hour six dose, 68% and 54%–77%; and 48 hour seven dose, 88% and 75%–98%. Sensitivity for the two radiologists for the identification of patients with polyps 1 cm or larger for each group was as follows: 24 hour two dose, 50% and 67%; 24 hour five dose, 100% and 100%; 48 hour four dose, 58% and 75%; 48 hour six dose, 56% and 67%; and 48 hour seven dose, 100% and 80%. CONCLUSION: Ingestion of contrast material adequately labels stool for lesion identification; a 48-hour lead time and multiple doses of contrast material are required. Sensitivity for polyp detection in patients with adequate stool labeling approaches the sensitivity for polyp detection in prepared colons. Colon, CT, 75.12115, 75.12143, 75.1283 Colon neoplasms, 75.30 Computed tomography (CT), contrast media, 75.12115, 75.12143, 75.1283

Journal

RadiologyRadiological Society of North America, Inc.

Published: Jun 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.