Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
This paper examines the relationship between the size of a target and the market's reaction to the announcement of a takeover offer. Using the constrained (0,1) market model to estimate abnormal returns, results from a sample of takeovers from 1984-88 indicate size effects for takeover targets at announcement date. While this outcome is consistent with both infor Mation asymmetry and liquidity explanations for the size effect, examination of the extent to which our whole-sample result is robust to a classification of the sample into sub-samples on the basis of outcome shows that the target size premium is explained by firms which are subject to a subsequent takeover. Sensitivity tests are conducted to establish the robustness of this result. We conclude that it is unlikely that a statistically significant target size effect is present in takeovers although the results are ambiguous.
Australian Journal of Management – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 1994
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.