Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
This paper provides a simple discussion of the interaction between forward contracts for electricity and electricity spot markets. Using a Cournot model of electricity pools, it is demonstrated that generators have a purely strategic incentive to sign forward contracts so as to raise their market share, by lowering price over the elastic portion of their individual demand curves. This, in turn, implies that the existence of the contract market lowers prices in pool markets and hence, over the industry. By mutually committing not to sign contracts, generator profits would be higher. But the existence of the contract market precludes such pre‐commitment. We demonstrate that when there are asymmetries between generators, contracting also allows efficient plants to operate relatively more, lowering the cost structure of the industry. Finally, we consider the effect of contracts on entry and find that it is possible that the existence of a contract market could deter otherwise efficient entry.
Australian Journal of Management – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 1998
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.