Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/sage/deep-ecology-living-as-if-nature-mattered-S2c0qBJ4af
References (6)
-
Deborah Slicer (1995)
Is There an Ecofeminism–Deep Ecology “Debate”?Environmental Ethics, 17
-
C. Egri (1997)
Spiritual Connections with the Natural EnvironmentOrganization & Environment, 10
-
A. Naess (1973)
The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary∗Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 16
-
Steven Best (1998)
Murray Bookchin's Theory of Social EcologyOrganization & Environment, 11
-
A. Salleh (1993)
Class, Race, and Gender Discourse in the Ecofeminism/Deep Ecology DebateEnvironmental Ethics, 15
-
Michael Christopher (1999)
An Exploration of the “Reflex” in Reflexive ModernityOrganization & Environment, 12
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- Copyright © by SAGE Publications
- ISSN
- 1086-0266
- eISSN
- 1552-7417
- DOI
- 10.1177/10826602015002005
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The theory of deep ecology has had a profound effect on many environmental political movements over the past generation. While this notion was first advanced by Arne Naess in Western Europe, deep ecology found its broadest and most influential popularization, especially in North America, in the work of Bill Devall and George Sessions. Their 1985 work, Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered, outlines their vision of deep ecology, and it is an important source for anyone interested in the ethics and politics of deep ecology.
Journal
Organization & Environment – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 2002