Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Evidence of Price Change Volatility Induced by the Number and Proportion of Orders of a Given Size

Evidence of Price Change Volatility Induced by the Number and Proportion of Orders of a Given Size We examine the contribution of order flow parameters (order size, number of orders and proportions of orders conditioned on order size) to the volatility of price change. To a lesser extent, we also examine the impact of these parameters on the mean of price change. Innovations in this study include the use of orders rather than trades and the testing of robustness of results across calendar and transaction time sampling.We find that: (a) there is a positive correlation between the number of orders, of any size, and volatility; (b) the price change in each order size category increases as order size increases; (c) number and proportion of orders are uncorrelated with price change per se; and (d) volatility appears negatively correlated with the proportion of small orders, uncorrelated with the proportion of medium‐sized orders, and positively correlated with the proportion of large orders. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Management SAGE

Evidence of Price Change Volatility Induced by the Number and Proportion of Orders of a Given Size

Walsh, David M.
Australian Journal of Management , Volume 23 (1): 17 – Jun 1, 1998
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/evidence-of-price-change-volatility-induced-by-the-number-and-9lpIJtSdnk
Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
0312-8962
eISSN
1327-2020
DOI
10.1177/031289629802300103
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We examine the contribution of order flow parameters (order size, number of orders and proportions of orders conditioned on order size) to the volatility of price change. To a lesser extent, we also examine the impact of these parameters on the mean of price change. Innovations in this study include the use of orders rather than trades and the testing of robustness of results across calendar and transaction time sampling.We find that: (a) there is a positive correlation between the number of orders, of any size, and volatility; (b) the price change in each order size category increases as order size increases; (c) number and proportion of orders are uncorrelated with price change per se; and (d) volatility appears negatively correlated with the proportion of small orders, uncorrelated with the proportion of medium‐sized orders, and positively correlated with the proportion of large orders.

Journal

Australian Journal of Management – SAGE

Published: Jun 1, 1998

There are no references for this article.