Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Explaining Structural Change in Organisations: Contingency Determinism or Contingency Fit

Explaining Structural Change in Organisations: Contingency Determinism or Contingency Fit Cross-sectional studies of organisation have yielded a number of relationships between contingencies and structure. However, some diachronic studies of changes in contingency and structure have not produced the results expected. The suggestion of this paper is that this may reflect inappropriate forms of data analysis based on a theoretical orientation of contingency determinism rather than contingency-fit. The former posits that a change in contingency directly causes a change in structure. The latter states that it is the lack of fit, a mismatch between contingency and structure, which leads to structural change. An illustration of the two alternative approaches is given by reference to longitudinal data on changes in strategy and structure. Two hypotheses derived from the contingency-fit model are confirmed, whereas the one derived from the contingency determinism approach is not. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Management SAGE

Explaining Structural Change in Organisations: Contingency Determinism or Contingency Fit

Donaldson, Lex
Australian Journal of Management , Volume 9 (2): 10 – Dec 1, 1984
Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/explaining-structural-change-in-organisations-contingency-determinism-k5d7Jaezt0
Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
0312-8962
eISSN
1327-2020
DOI
10.1177/031289628400900202
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Cross-sectional studies of organisation have yielded a number of relationships between contingencies and structure. However, some diachronic studies of changes in contingency and structure have not produced the results expected. The suggestion of this paper is that this may reflect inappropriate forms of data analysis based on a theoretical orientation of contingency determinism rather than contingency-fit. The former posits that a change in contingency directly causes a change in structure. The latter states that it is the lack of fit, a mismatch between contingency and structure, which leads to structural change. An illustration of the two alternative approaches is given by reference to longitudinal data on changes in strategy and structure. Two hypotheses derived from the contingency-fit model are confirmed, whereas the one derived from the contingency determinism approach is not.

Journal

Australian Journal of Management – SAGE

Published: Dec 1, 1984

There are no references for this article.