Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Kitchen sink dramas: women, modernity and space in Weimar Germany

Kitchen sink dramas: women, modernity and space in Weimar Germany This article uses historical evidence about the competing designs of kitchens in1920s German social housing to argue that historians (and, to an extent,geographers) have overlooked the coercive capacity of space to compel certain formsof social relationship. Such has been the potency of the‘cultural’ model in history and geography that the‘material’ world has been cloaked by language and symbol.Bourgeois politicians, planners and reformers in 1920s Germany were not onlycompelled to think about domestic space for the poor for the first time, but had toactually produce the physical space if they wanted to make their ideologies‘live’. This article also shows that if we disaggregate thespace of the home into its constituent parts (rather than simply contrasting theprivate and the public realms), different gender ideologies could be designed intodomestic space, forcing families to adopt ways of living and patterns of sociabilityaccording to the priorities of, variously, ‘Americanizers’,socialists, conservatives and liberals. The kitchen designs of Frankfurt are wellknown, but in fact those of Munich were probably more widespread, and so this workfurther serves to decentre the canon of Modernism which dominates much discussion ofWeimar building. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Cultural Geographies SAGE

Kitchen sink dramas: women, modernity and space in Weimar Germany

Cultural Geographies , Volume 13 (4): 19 – Oct 1, 2006

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/kitchen-sink-dramas-women-modernity-and-space-in-weimar-germany-90uaFlsx5I

References (39)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
1474-4740
eISSN
1477-0881
DOI
10.1191/1474474006cgj374oa
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article uses historical evidence about the competing designs of kitchens in1920s German social housing to argue that historians (and, to an extent,geographers) have overlooked the coercive capacity of space to compel certain formsof social relationship. Such has been the potency of the‘cultural’ model in history and geography that the‘material’ world has been cloaked by language and symbol.Bourgeois politicians, planners and reformers in 1920s Germany were not onlycompelled to think about domestic space for the poor for the first time, but had toactually produce the physical space if they wanted to make their ideologies‘live’. This article also shows that if we disaggregate thespace of the home into its constituent parts (rather than simply contrasting theprivate and the public realms), different gender ideologies could be designed intodomestic space, forcing families to adopt ways of living and patterns of sociabilityaccording to the priorities of, variously, ‘Americanizers’,socialists, conservatives and liberals. The kitchen designs of Frankfurt are wellknown, but in fact those of Munich were probably more widespread, and so this workfurther serves to decentre the canon of Modernism which dominates much discussion ofWeimar building.

Journal

Cultural GeographiesSAGE

Published: Oct 1, 2006

There are no references for this article.