Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Legitimizing Corporate (Un) Sustainability: A Case Study of Passive SMEs

Legitimizing Corporate (Un) Sustainability: A Case Study of Passive SMEs The objective of this article is to explore how decision makers in small- and medium-sized enterprises explain their lack of commitment to sustainability through various justifications. These justifications are intended to rationalize and legitimize, through socially acceptable arguments, the absence of substantial actions in this area. A case study based on 33 interviews in nine Canadian small- and medium-sized enterprises showed that managers rationalize their lack of commitment to sustainability in several different ways. These can be grouped into three main types of justifications: prioritization of economic survival, looking for a scapegoat, and denial and minimization (denial of negative impacts, minimization of sustainability issues, self-proclaimed sustainability). The study contributes to bridge the gap between the literatures on neutralization theory, resistance to institutional pressures, and corporate unsustainability. It also sheds further light on the reasons underlying the lack of commitment to sustainable development and how managers justify this to themselves and others. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Organization & Environment SAGE

Legitimizing Corporate (Un) Sustainability: A Case Study of Passive SMEs

Organization & Environment , Volume 30 (4): 22 – Dec 1, 2017

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/legitimizing-corporate-un-sustainability-a-case-study-of-passive-smes-ZQH6Bie3ab

References (105)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2016 SAGE Publications
ISSN
1086-0266
eISSN
1552-7417
DOI
10.1177/1086026616672065
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The objective of this article is to explore how decision makers in small- and medium-sized enterprises explain their lack of commitment to sustainability through various justifications. These justifications are intended to rationalize and legitimize, through socially acceptable arguments, the absence of substantial actions in this area. A case study based on 33 interviews in nine Canadian small- and medium-sized enterprises showed that managers rationalize their lack of commitment to sustainability in several different ways. These can be grouped into three main types of justifications: prioritization of economic survival, looking for a scapegoat, and denial and minimization (denial of negative impacts, minimization of sustainability issues, self-proclaimed sustainability). The study contributes to bridge the gap between the literatures on neutralization theory, resistance to institutional pressures, and corporate unsustainability. It also sheds further light on the reasons underlying the lack of commitment to sustainable development and how managers justify this to themselves and others.

Journal

Organization & EnvironmentSAGE

Published: Dec 1, 2017

There are no references for this article.