Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
96 Adoption & Fostering 47(1) potential risks to the child were such that Children Act 1989 – the effect of a care the court should take the very unusual step order. of granting a declaration that the child The court found further that section 100, could be given medication immediately which prevents the court giving leave to a after birth without his parents’ consent. local authority to apply for an order where the result could be achieved by the making of an order under the Children Act, would Removing a mobile phone: apply. A care order would allow a local Deprivation of liberty? authority to remove a child’s mobile phone Manchester City Council v P (Refusal of or restrict internet use and so the court Restrictions on Mobile Phone) could not grant leave to apply for an High Court Family Division, MacDonald J order. It might be necessary if physical 27 January 2023 [2023] EWHC 133 (Fam) force were required, but in most cases it would not be appropriate to apply for the P was a 16-year-old child who was made the use of the inherent jurisdiction if removal of subject of a full care order and a deprivation
Adoption & Fostering – SAGE
Published: Mar 1, 2023
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.