Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Subscribe now for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Policy and Planning for Large-Infrastructure Projects: Problems, Causes, Cures

Policy and Planning for Large-Infrastructure Projects: Problems, Causes, Cures This paper focuses on problems and their causes and cures in policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects. First, it identifies as the main problem in major infrastructure developments pervasive misinformation about the costs, benefits, and risks involved. A consequence of misinformation is cost overruns, benefit shortfalls, and waste. Second, it explores the causes of misinformation and finds that political-economic explanations best account for the available evidence: planners and promoters deliberately misrepresent costs, benefits, and risks in order to increase the likelihood that it is their projects, and not those of their competition, that gain approval and funding. This results in the ‘survival of the unfittest’, in which often it is not the best projects that are built, but the most misrepresented ones. Finally, it presents measures for reforming policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects with a focus on better planning methods and changed governance structures, the latter being more important. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design SAGE

Policy and Planning for Large-Infrastructure Projects: Problems, Causes, Cures

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/policy-and-planning-for-large-infrastructure-projects-problems-causes-R00fKrmiYP

References (49)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2007 SAGE Publications
ISSN
0265-8135
eISSN
1472-3417
DOI
10.1068/b32111
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper focuses on problems and their causes and cures in policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects. First, it identifies as the main problem in major infrastructure developments pervasive misinformation about the costs, benefits, and risks involved. A consequence of misinformation is cost overruns, benefit shortfalls, and waste. Second, it explores the causes of misinformation and finds that political-economic explanations best account for the available evidence: planners and promoters deliberately misrepresent costs, benefits, and risks in order to increase the likelihood that it is their projects, and not those of their competition, that gain approval and funding. This results in the ‘survival of the unfittest’, in which often it is not the best projects that are built, but the most misrepresented ones. Finally, it presents measures for reforming policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects with a focus on better planning methods and changed governance structures, the latter being more important.

Journal

Environment and Planning B: Planning and DesignSAGE

Published: Aug 1, 2007

There are no references for this article.