Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Promoting Nurses’ Critique of the Scholarly Literature

Promoting Nurses’ Critique of the Scholarly Literature 1104792 JAPXXX10.1177/10783903221104792Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses AssociationPearson editorial2022 Editorial Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association 2022, Vol. 28(4) 267 –268 Promoting Nurses’ Critique © The Author(s) 2022 Article reuse guidelines: of the Scholarly Literature sagepub.com/journals-permissions https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903221104792 DOI: 10.1177/10783903221104792 journals.sagepub.com/home/jap Geraldine S. Pearson JAPNA has received numerous submissions of papers Introduction concerning COVID management, nursing care, and the A recent interview with medical writer Ivan Oransky, effects on staff. These papers have received the same dili- Co-Founder of Retraction Watch (retractionwatch.com), gent editor review and peer review (if they haven’t been addresses the ongoing problems of quality peer review, rejected by the editor) and decision-making that are applied flawed research, and subsequent retraction (Flight, 2022). to all journal submissions. (See “Review Process” at https:// He specifically spoke about nonspecialist readers of sci- us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal-of-the-american-psy- entific literature and their need to be cautious and skepti- chiatric-nurses-association/journal201684#submission- cal about what they read (Flight, 2022). In fact, all readers guidelines.) Many papers have been rejected. Those of JAPNA, regardless of their specialization and scientific accepted have met the quality standards and the goal of background, are consumers of the information they read adding to nursing knowledge. and should ALWAYS be critical of http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association SAGE

Promoting Nurses’ Critique of the Scholarly Literature

Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/promoting-nurses-critique-of-the-scholarly-literature-HIvQt993Us

References (7)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022
ISSN
1078-3903
eISSN
1532-5725
DOI
10.1177/10783903221104792
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

1104792 JAPXXX10.1177/10783903221104792Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses AssociationPearson editorial2022 Editorial Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association 2022, Vol. 28(4) 267 –268 Promoting Nurses’ Critique © The Author(s) 2022 Article reuse guidelines: of the Scholarly Literature sagepub.com/journals-permissions https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903221104792 DOI: 10.1177/10783903221104792 journals.sagepub.com/home/jap Geraldine S. Pearson JAPNA has received numerous submissions of papers Introduction concerning COVID management, nursing care, and the A recent interview with medical writer Ivan Oransky, effects on staff. These papers have received the same dili- Co-Founder of Retraction Watch (retractionwatch.com), gent editor review and peer review (if they haven’t been addresses the ongoing problems of quality peer review, rejected by the editor) and decision-making that are applied flawed research, and subsequent retraction (Flight, 2022). to all journal submissions. (See “Review Process” at https:// He specifically spoke about nonspecialist readers of sci- us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal-of-the-american-psy- entific literature and their need to be cautious and skepti- chiatric-nurses-association/journal201684#submission- cal about what they read (Flight, 2022). In fact, all readers guidelines.) Many papers have been rejected. Those of JAPNA, regardless of their specialization and scientific accepted have met the quality standards and the goal of background, are consumers of the information they read adding to nursing knowledge. and should ALWAYS be critical of

Journal

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association – SAGE

Published: Jul 1, 2022

There are no references for this article.