Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Revisiting “Think. Check. Submit.”

Revisiting “Think. Check. Submit.” 1116639 JAPXXX10.1177/10783903221116639Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses AssociationPearson editorial2022 Editorial Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association 2022, Vol. 28(5) 353 –354 © The Author(s) 2022 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903221116639 DOI: 10.1177/10783903221116639 journals.sagepub.com/home/jap Geraldine S. Pearson An editorial was previously published in Journal of the Mills and Inouye (2020) noted that some faculty, under American Psychiatric Nurses Association (JAPNA) pressure to publish and advance their careers, may delib- detailing the initiative, Think. Check. Submit., as a way erately submit a paper to a predatory journal to garner to avoid submitting scholarly manuscripts to predatory numerous publications in a short time period. Other chal- journals (Pearson, 2017). Since I wrote that editorial, lenges facing authors and forcing consideration of a pred- more research detailing the pitfalls of predatory publish- atory journal may involve lack of proficiency with the ing has come out in the nursing literature (Oermann et al., English language, impatience with the length of time it 2018, 2020; Owens & Nicoll, 2019). This editorial will takes to move through the review and revision processes focus on updates to this issue and offer additional strate- for most nursing journals, and difficulty getting a manu- gies for authors to http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association SAGE

Revisiting “Think. Check. Submit.”

Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/revisiting-think-check-submit-yiXn0LFcOs

References (16)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022
ISSN
1078-3903
eISSN
1532-5725
DOI
10.1177/10783903221116639
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

1116639 JAPXXX10.1177/10783903221116639Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses AssociationPearson editorial2022 Editorial Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association 2022, Vol. 28(5) 353 –354 © The Author(s) 2022 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903221116639 DOI: 10.1177/10783903221116639 journals.sagepub.com/home/jap Geraldine S. Pearson An editorial was previously published in Journal of the Mills and Inouye (2020) noted that some faculty, under American Psychiatric Nurses Association (JAPNA) pressure to publish and advance their careers, may delib- detailing the initiative, Think. Check. Submit., as a way erately submit a paper to a predatory journal to garner to avoid submitting scholarly manuscripts to predatory numerous publications in a short time period. Other chal- journals (Pearson, 2017). Since I wrote that editorial, lenges facing authors and forcing consideration of a pred- more research detailing the pitfalls of predatory publish- atory journal may involve lack of proficiency with the ing has come out in the nursing literature (Oermann et al., English language, impatience with the length of time it 2018, 2020; Owens & Nicoll, 2019). This editorial will takes to move through the review and revision processes focus on updates to this issue and offer additional strate- for most nursing journals, and difficulty getting a manu- gies for authors to

Journal

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association – SAGE

Published: Sep 1, 2022

There are no references for this article.