Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Evans (1996)
Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergyWorld Development, 24
Tim Bartley, A. Bergesen (1997)
World-system Studies of the EnvironmentJournal of World-Systems Research, 3
W. Sunderlin (1995)
Managerialism and the conceptual limits of sustainable developmentSociety & Natural Resources, 8
K. Gould, A. Schnaiberg, Adam Weinberg (1996)
Local Environmental Struggles: Subject Index
D. Booth (1985)
Marxism and Development Sociology: Interpreting the ImpasseWorld Development, 13
T. Skocpol (1979)
States and social revolutions : a comparative analysis of France, Russia, and ChinaThe American Historical Review, 20
J. Martínez-Alier (1997)
Environmental justice (Local and Global)Capitalism Nature Socialism, 8
J. Migdal, A. Kohli, Vivienne Shue (1996)
State power and social forces : domination and transformation in the Third WorldThe Journal of Asian Studies, 54
E. Wright (1996)
Review of Peter Evans, Embedded AutonomyContemporary Sociology, 25
N. Peluso (1993)
Coercing conservation?: The politics of state resource controlGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 3
Harriet Friedma, P. McMichael (1989)
AGRICULTURE AND THE STATE SYSTEM: The rise and decline of national agricultures, 1870 to the presentSociologia Ruralis, 29
Stephen Gill, David Law (1993)
Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations: Global hegemony and the structural power of capital
This article is intended to initiate a dialogue on strategies for understanding the roles of states in relation to sustainability. The contributions and shortcomings of the two most influential and provocative approaches-nomothetic theories of states stressing the tendencies of capitalist states to exacerbate environmental destruction and embedded autonomy! state-society synergy theories of the conditions under which state-civil society partnerships can lead to sustainability innovations-are discussed. It is suggested that neither of these traditions can satisfactorily address the central contradictions of states and sustainability-that states are simultaneously a foundational force underlying environmental destruction and the principal agent of sustainability reforms. It is suggested that this contradiction can best be addressed through a modified world-order perspective based on global regimes of development and accumulation. The limits of state policy making and sustainability are currently being defined by the attempt to construct a neoliberal-globalization order and its attendant international policy regimes. The author concludes with some speculative thoughts about the role that market-oriented environmental tax institutions could play in the evolving world order.
Organization & Environment – SAGE
Published: Sep 1, 1998
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.