Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Impact of Causal Attributions on Managers' Responses to Subordinate Poor Perfor Mance: An Exploratory Study Using Naturalistic Data

The Impact of Causal Attributions on Managers' Responses to Subordinate Poor Perfor Mance: An... Three exploratory hypotheses derived from Green and Mitchell's attributional model of leaders' responses to poor perfor Mance were investigated in a qualitative study and a naturalistic setting. Findings were that managers did attribute causes to poor perfor Mance. Attributions could also be classified into “internal” and “external” categories. However, results showed that responses were also often influenced by considerations other than causal factors, such as perceived responsibilities to staff, organisational constraints and the prognosis for future perfor Mance. Limitations of the study are then identified and discussed. Implications for the reliability of locus of attribution as an indicator of direction of response are discussed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Management SAGE

The Impact of Causal Attributions on Managers' Responses to Subordinate Poor Perfor Mance: An Exploratory Study Using Naturalistic Data

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/the-impact-of-causal-attributions-on-managers-responses-to-subordinate-ldi6KVpjOh

References (40)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
0312-8962
eISSN
1327-2020
DOI
10.1177/031289628801300213
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Three exploratory hypotheses derived from Green and Mitchell's attributional model of leaders' responses to poor perfor Mance were investigated in a qualitative study and a naturalistic setting. Findings were that managers did attribute causes to poor perfor Mance. Attributions could also be classified into “internal” and “external” categories. However, results showed that responses were also often influenced by considerations other than causal factors, such as perceived responsibilities to staff, organisational constraints and the prognosis for future perfor Mance. Limitations of the study are then identified and discussed. Implications for the reliability of locus of attribution as an indicator of direction of response are discussed.

Journal

Australian Journal of ManagementSAGE

Published: Dec 1, 1988

There are no references for this article.