Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The impact of formation and diversity on student team conflict

The impact of formation and diversity on student team conflict Instructors of college level business courses utilize group assignments to stress the importance of collaborative work in professional organizations for students. How instructors determine team formation, whether assigning students to groups or allowing students to form their own groups, could impact the effectiveness of the group regarding their cohesiveness, conflict, or social loafing. Best practices suggest that instructors strategically assign students to teams to maximize the diversity of the members. However, could the diversity of group members contribute to conflict amongst members? Could the formation method contribute to the members’ functioning as a team or group? The research questions in the study are: To what degree does team formation method impact (1) members’ conflict; (2) members’ cohesiveness; (3) members’ social loafing; and (4) members’ functioning as a team or group? Over 2 years, simultaneous sections of the same management course utilized different team formation procedures. Each year in one section, the instructor designed teams to maximize diversity of members. In the other course section, students freely formed their own teams. The findings suggest that instructor-designed diverse teams did not increase member conflict. Also, student-selected teams did not improve team cohesiveness. However, instructor-designed diverse teams did impact social loafing and the members’ functioning as a team. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Active Learning in Higher Education SAGE

The impact of formation and diversity on student team conflict

Maguire, Diana; Keceli, Yavuz
Active Learning in Higher Education , Volume OnlineFirst: 1 – Jan 1, 2023
Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/the-impact-of-formation-and-diversity-on-student-team-conflict-dkEIL3RQbB
Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023
ISSN
1469-7874
eISSN
1741-2625
DOI
10.1177/14697874221144998
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Instructors of college level business courses utilize group assignments to stress the importance of collaborative work in professional organizations for students. How instructors determine team formation, whether assigning students to groups or allowing students to form their own groups, could impact the effectiveness of the group regarding their cohesiveness, conflict, or social loafing. Best practices suggest that instructors strategically assign students to teams to maximize the diversity of the members. However, could the diversity of group members contribute to conflict amongst members? Could the formation method contribute to the members’ functioning as a team or group? The research questions in the study are: To what degree does team formation method impact (1) members’ conflict; (2) members’ cohesiveness; (3) members’ social loafing; and (4) members’ functioning as a team or group? Over 2 years, simultaneous sections of the same management course utilized different team formation procedures. Each year in one section, the instructor designed teams to maximize diversity of members. In the other course section, students freely formed their own teams. The findings suggest that instructor-designed diverse teams did not increase member conflict. Also, student-selected teams did not improve team cohesiveness. However, instructor-designed diverse teams did impact social loafing and the members’ functioning as a team.

Journal

Active Learning in Higher Education – SAGE

Published: Jan 1, 2023

Keywords: collaborative assignments; higher education; social loafing; team diversity; team formation

References

  • Team size, dispersion, and social loafing in technology-supported teams: A perspective on the theory of moral disengagement
    Alnuaimi, OA; Robert, LP; Maruping, LM
  • Groups vs. Teams: Which one are you leading?
    Armstead, C; Bierman, D; Bradshaw, P
  • A critical look at the use of group projects as a pedagogical tool
    Ashraf, M
  • Struggles for cooperation: Conflict resolution strategies in multicultural groups
    Boroş, S; Meslec, N; Curşeu, PL
  • Sustaining collaborative effort in work teams: Exchange ideology and employee social loafing
    Byun, G; Lee, S; Karau, SJ
  • What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite
    Cohen, SG; Bailey, DE
  • Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness
    Cox, TH; Blake, S
  • Moving beyond relationship and task conflict: Toward a process-state perspective
    DeChurch, LA; Mesmer-Magnus, JR; Doty, D
  • Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis
    De Dreu, CK; Weingart, LR
  • Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation
    Díaz-García, C; González-Moreno, A; Jose Sáez-Martínez, F
  • Diversity’s contribution to the bottom line: Assigning a monetary value to diversity initiatives
    Dodds, I; David, A; Moss, G; Moss, G
  • Perceived organizational support
    Eisenberger, R; Huntington, R; Hutchison, S
  • The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution
    Hall, D; Buzwell, S
  • The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves
    Hambrick, DC; Cho, TS; Chen, MJ
  • The compositional impact of team diversity on performance: Theoretical considerations
    Horwitz, SK
  • Diversity in conscientiousness and team composition: Their relationships with team conflict, performance, and satisfaction (Order No
    Hua, LA
  • Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance
    Huckman, RS; Staats, BR
  • Teams - diversity study
    Maguire, D
  • Reaping the fruits of another’s labor: The role of moral meaningfulness, mindfulness, and motivation in social loafing
    Mihelič, KK; Culiberg, B
  • Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups
    Milliken, FJ; Martins, LL
  • Turning student groups into effective teams
    Oakley, B; Felder, RM; Brent, R
  • Work group demography, social integration, and turnover
    O’Reilly, CA; Caldwell, DF; Barnett, WP
  • Should there be a romance between teams and groups?
    Paulus, PB; Zee, K
  • Does active learning work? A review of the research
    Prince, M
  • Collaborative learning supported by rubrics improves critical thinking
    Saiz Sanchez, C; Fernandez Rivas, S; Olivares Moral, S
  • Effect of conflict and emotions on perceptions of social loafing in groups
    Singh, S; Zhu, M; Wang, H
  • Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication
    Smith, KG; Smith, KA; Olian, JD
  • An evaluation of a group project designed to reduce free-riding and promote active learning
    Swaray, R
  • Fostering creativity in intercultural and interdisciplinary teams: The VICTORY model
    Tang, M
  • The conceptualization of team flow
    van Den Hout, JJJ; Davis, OC; Weggeman, MCD
  • Top management team demography and corporate strategic change
    Wiersema, MF; Bantel, KA