Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Limits of Institutions and the Reliance on Heuristics during the COVID-19 Pandemic:

The Limits of Institutions and the Reliance on Heuristics during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Leadership matters, but even more so in the midst of a crisis, where institutional mechanisms may be unequipped to deal with fast-moving circumstances. During such times, leaders are also prone to satisficing and relying on heuristics in order to come to decisions. This paper surveys the use of political heuristics and asserts that their use is directly proportional to the abilities of institutions; where institutions have no formal mechanisms to deal with a crisis, heuristics are relied on more heavily. In such a situation, policies tend to be more extreme than otherwise. Using the COVID-19 pandemic as the background, and in particular the decision to enter into a lockdown of varying degrees, this paper examines the use of heuristics by leaders during the crisis. Combining a case study approach with an empirical exercise, I show that institutional mechanisms were important for determining the response to the coronavirus as the pandemic began. However, once the full extent of the crisis was apparent, the attributes of leaders—relying on their pre-formed heuristics and playing out according to their ideologies, background, and experience—played a much more important role in determining the lockdown policy in a particular nation. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Sociology SAGE

The Limits of Institutions and the Reliance on Heuristics during the COVID-19 Pandemic:

Hartwell, Christopher A.
Journal of Applied Sociology , Volume 16 (2): 23 – Feb 22, 2022
Download PDF
23 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/the-limits-of-institutions-and-the-reliance-on-heuristics-during-the-sbkKPTiDap
Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 by Association for Applied and Clinical Sociology
ISSN
0749-0232
eISSN
1937-0245
DOI
10.1177/19367244221077410
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Leadership matters, but even more so in the midst of a crisis, where institutional mechanisms may be unequipped to deal with fast-moving circumstances. During such times, leaders are also prone to satisficing and relying on heuristics in order to come to decisions. This paper surveys the use of political heuristics and asserts that their use is directly proportional to the abilities of institutions; where institutions have no formal mechanisms to deal with a crisis, heuristics are relied on more heavily. In such a situation, policies tend to be more extreme than otherwise. Using the COVID-19 pandemic as the background, and in particular the decision to enter into a lockdown of varying degrees, this paper examines the use of heuristics by leaders during the crisis. Combining a case study approach with an empirical exercise, I show that institutional mechanisms were important for determining the response to the coronavirus as the pandemic began. However, once the full extent of the crisis was apparent, the attributes of leaders—relying on their pre-formed heuristics and playing out according to their ideologies, background, and experience—played a much more important role in determining the lockdown policy in a particular nation.

Journal

Journal of Applied Sociology – SAGE

Published: Feb 22, 2022

Keywords: COVID-19; heuristics; lockdown; institutions

There are no references for this article.