Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/sage/the-messy-politics-of-clean-coal-BPd5IVtyXz
References (43)
-
Clean coal? Obama funds research to capture carbon -
(2011)
Communicating the risks of CCS -
E. Alves (2010)
Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility by Ted Nordhaus & Michael ShellenbergerSustainable Development Law and Policy, 8
-
A. Clarke (2005)
Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn -
Hon Walsh (1924)
Clean CoalThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 111
-
C. Bosso (2005)
Environment, Inc.: From Grassroots to Beltway -
David Pellow (2008)
Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of PossibilityEnvironmental Justice, 1
-
(2010)
We're committed to a clean energy future with coal -
(2009)
The proposed AMP-Ohio coal plant: A bad deal for electric customers and a financial risk JPMorgan Chase should not take -
(2007)
Ohio EPA set to OK coal plant, even though project fails to comply with Clean Air Act -
(2009)
Can burying carbon emissions work? -
(2005)
Ohio climate road map -
S. Funtowicz, J. Ravetz (1985)
Three Types of Risk Assessment: A Methodological Analysis -
(2009)
AMP-Ohio response to issues raised by Ohio citizens action regarding the AMPGS -
(2009)
Can burying carbon emissions work? Retrieved from http://edition -
Swetha Dhananka, M. Maggetti (2012)
Putting Social Movements in their Place. Explaining Opposition to Energy Projects in the United States, 2000‐2005McAdam, Doug and Schaffer Boudet Hilary Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2012), 266 p., ISBN 978‐1‐107‐65031‐2Swiss Political Science Review, 18
-
(2008)
she was awarded a postdoctoral fellowship from the National Science Foundation for a project titled The Messy Politics of -
J. Meyer (2008)
Populism, paternalism and the state of environmentalism in the USEnvironmental Politics, 17
-
A. Palmer, C. Hendriks, O. Kaarstad, M. Ozaki (2006)
SUMMARY OF THE IPCC SPECIAL REPORT ON CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND STORAGE -
E. Pooley (2010)
The Climate War: True Believers, Power Brokers, and the Fight to Save the Earth -
(2009)
Ad firm touts its "clean coal" persuasion work -
(2008)
Fixing the bungled US environmental movement -
(2009)
Covello (Eds.), Risk assessment in the private sector (pp. 217-231) -
(2003)
Legislative issue advertising in the 107th Congress -
(2005)
Ohio climate road map. Columbus: Ohio -
(2008)
The clean coal smoke screen -
B. Wynne (2006)
Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?Public Health Genomics, 9
-
(2009)
The "clean coal" lobbying blitz -
R. Smolker (1968)
The environmental defense fundBiological Conservation, 1
-
(2008)
Coal king Peabody cleans up. USA Today -
(2005)
International alliance calls for end to term "clean coal -
B. Heyman (2012)
Risk and culture -
Robert Brulle, J. Jenkins (2008)
Fixing the Bungled U.S. Environmental MovementContexts, 7
-
(2005)
How to clean coal. OnEarth -
S. Bell, Richard York (2010)
Community Economic Identity: The Coal Industry and Ideology Construction in West VirginiaRural Sociology, 75
-
(2000)
Coal questions and answers -
(2009)
Fact sheet: Carbon capture & storage -
(2010)
Environmental movements & waste infrastructure -
(2011)
California’s Carbon Capture & Storage Review Panel releases its recommendations -
Thomas Beamish (2014)
Putting Social Movements in their Place: Explaining Opposition to Energy Projects in the United States, 2000–2005Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 43
-
(2007)
Coal: Myths and realities, fighting bronx pollution, carbon capture and early earth day call for clean energy on Capitol Hill -
S. Star, J. Griesemer (1989)
Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39Social Studies of Science, 19
-
Daiju Narita (2012)
Managing uncertainties: The making of the IPCC’s Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and StoragePublic Understanding of Science, 21
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- © 2012 SAGE Publications
- ISSN
- 1086-0266
- eISSN
- 1552-7417
- DOI
- 10.1177/1086026612466091
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Clean coal is a widely used and highly contested term in debates over energy policy and climate change in the United States. While the discourse of “clean coal” originated in industry and government circles, it has been debated, shaped, and contested by a wide range of players, including environmental and social justice groups. In this article, I examine how different local, regional, and national environmental and social justice groups participate in debating and defining these technologies and their implications for the energy future of the region.
Journal
Organization & Environment – SAGE
Published: Dec 1, 2012