Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2009)
For an illustration of this popular view of the Indian Ocean, see Kaplan
U.S. adds forces in Persian Gulf, a signal to Iran. The New York Times
(1998)
Al-nizam al-'iqlimi al-khaliji
B. Buzan, R. Little (1994)
The Idea of "International System": Theory Meets HistoryInternational Political Science Review, 15
(2003)
Pakistan and the Afghan conflict 1979–85
The Pak-Saudi nuke, and how to stop it
(2008)
China in the Middle East: Perspectives from the Arab world
A Sino-Persian grab for the Indian Ocean?
Saudi Arabia's nuclear gambit
J. Šedivý (2004)
Regions and Powers: The Structure of International SecurityJournal of International Relations and Development, 7
P. Kumaraswamy (2006)
At What Cost Israel-China Ties?Middle East Quarterly
Saudi Arabia's search for security. Adelphi Paper No. 158, International Institute for Strategic Studies
(1994)
On this intellectual bias, see Agnew
Saudi Arabia in secret nuke pact
India looks beyond Iran to boost its crude oil supplies. The Hindu
(2004)
New schools in security theory and the origins between core and periphery
(2011)
For an illustration of this narrative, see, for instance
Shifting Pakistan and Saudi Arabia relations. The Express Tribune
(2002)
The anarchical society (3rd edition). Basingstoke: PalgraveMacmillan
The global power shift to Asia: Geostrategic and geopolitical implications. Al Jazeera Centre for Studies
Harsh Pant (2011)
India's Relations with Iran: Much Ado about NothingThe Washington Quarterly, 34
(1994)
The idea of international system
(2003)
A Saudi nuclear option? Survival
R. Kaplan (2009)
Center stage for the twenty-first century: power plays in the Indian oceanForeign affairs report, 2009
Pakistan's eternal quest for 'strategic balance'. The Friday Times
R. Russell (2001)
A Saudi nuclear option?Survival, 43
J. Agnew (1994)
The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theoryReview of International Political Economy, 1
Christopher Davidson (2010)
Persian Gulf and Pacific Asia: From Indifference to Interdependence
Sustaining U.S. global leadership: Priorities for 21st century defense
(2012)
June–July). The Pak-Saudi nuke, and how to stop it
Ziba Moshaver (2012)
The International Relations of the Persian GulfJournal of Arabian Studies, 2
(1981)
The Saudi–Pakistan military relationship and its implications for US strategy in Southeast Asia
(2006)
On the ramifications of the A.Q. Khan proliferation network, see Corera
Israeli troops to train Indians in counterterrorism. Defense News
(2009)
India’s growing role in the Gulf: Implications for the region and the United States
(1997)
Regional security complexes: A systems approach
D. Rodman (2012)
India's Israel policyIsrael Affairs, 18
From Israel, lessons of fighting terror. The Indian Express
(2010)
For an in-depth look at the bilateral relationship, see Kumaraswamy
(2012)
On this debate, see Pande
See, among others, Davidson (2010) and Huwaidin
(2012)
The global power shift to Asia: Geostrategic and geopolitical implications
E. Inbar, A. Ningthoujam (2011)
Indo-Israeli Defense Cooperation in the Twenty-First Century, 15
China exceeds US to become Saudi Arabia's top oil customer
Gordon Corera (2006)
Shopping for Bombs: Nuclear Proliferation, Global Insecurity, and the Rise and Fall of the A.Q. Khan Network
(1998)
Al-nizam al-‘iqlimi al-khaliji [The Gulf regional system
This article evaluates the current relations between Gulf monarchies and South Asian States (India, Pakistan) as well as China. Economic ties between the Arabian Peninsula and these Asian countries grew in earnest in recent years leading to the making of a popular narrative which states that this rapprochement is a consequence of the international redistribution of power from the West to the East. The narrative argues that in coming years the decline of the United States and European countries will lead to their retreat from their historical areas of influence. However the idea of a rising Gulf-Asian strategic nexus is shaped by misleading geopolitical determinism. It derives from the belief that Gulf and Asian countries are part of one and the same geopolitical space and implies that international relations are merely a zero-sum game according to which rising Saudi-China relations equate to declining Saudi–US relations. This article challenges this narrative by arguing that despite these interactions, the Persian Gulf and Asia do not blend into an interregional entity or a ‘meso-system’. Eventually national security considerations prevail and although bilateral ties between countries from the two areas are likely to grow in the economic domain, there is no reason to think that the two regional complexes will merge at the political and strategic levels.
Contemporary Review of the Middle East – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.