Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Town–Country Antithesis and the Environment

The Town–Country Antithesis and the Environment Current sociological interest in “real utopias” demands a critical evaluation of potential academic contributions to the subject. The following is a sociological critique of the real utopian project of abolishing the antithesis between town and country. The analysis uncovers a fundamental dilemma in theorizing how to transform this antithesis. On one hand, social and natural scientists have acknowledged that modern urbanization and the urban–rural divide contribute to the creation of a rift in the relationship between humans and the natural environment. On the other hand, modern cities, based on arguments about the efficiency of urban density, are defended by a wide variety of scholars. Nevertheless, in turning to a socioecological framework of analysis based on the work of Marx and Engels and metabolic rift theory, this dilemma can be resolved. This framework emphasizes that modern cities are the result of interdependent development, which is expressed through the antithesis between town and country. This antithesis is the intervening mechanism in which the metabolic rift is spatially observed and carried out. That the ecological rift is now planetary demands a real utopian project in which dramatically different social and spatial relations are theorized. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Organization & Environment SAGE

The Town–Country Antithesis and the Environment

Organization & Environment , Volume 24 (3): 20 – Sep 1, 2011

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/the-town-country-antithesis-and-the-environment-L89swuoR7z

References (76)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© SAGE Publications 2011
ISSN
1086-0266
eISSN
1552-7417
DOI
10.1177/1086026611413932
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Current sociological interest in “real utopias” demands a critical evaluation of potential academic contributions to the subject. The following is a sociological critique of the real utopian project of abolishing the antithesis between town and country. The analysis uncovers a fundamental dilemma in theorizing how to transform this antithesis. On one hand, social and natural scientists have acknowledged that modern urbanization and the urban–rural divide contribute to the creation of a rift in the relationship between humans and the natural environment. On the other hand, modern cities, based on arguments about the efficiency of urban density, are defended by a wide variety of scholars. Nevertheless, in turning to a socioecological framework of analysis based on the work of Marx and Engels and metabolic rift theory, this dilemma can be resolved. This framework emphasizes that modern cities are the result of interdependent development, which is expressed through the antithesis between town and country. This antithesis is the intervening mechanism in which the metabolic rift is spatially observed and carried out. That the ecological rift is now planetary demands a real utopian project in which dramatically different social and spatial relations are theorized.

Journal

Organization & EnvironmentSAGE

Published: Sep 1, 2011

There are no references for this article.