Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet

Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet This article engages with and critiques dominant theories of political ecology. It takes the theory of ecologically unequal exchange (EUE) as the framework of critique. It assesses the claims of “fossil capitalism,” eco-modernism, extractivism, and degrowth, as well as the theories of “post-development.” It finds that with the exception of degrowth, none of them take imperialism or the global history of accumulation sufficiently seriously, and either displace transformative obligations wholly onto the South or adopt a framework which centers merely the agency of the Northern working class or a class-blind movement of movements. Instead, it proposes modifications of EUE based on the polarized nature of accumulation and waste production and distribution, and neocolonialism. It uses that framework to identify the antisystemic role of nature-reliant peripheral semi-proletarian classes, and from there reopens the debate on appropriate-scale industrialization along with ecological transformations of agriculture as paths to development in the twenty-first century. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy SAGE

Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet

Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy , Volume 12 (1): 39 – Mar 1, 2023

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/theories-of-political-ecology-monopoly-capital-against-people-and-the-5gPDv8DP0r
Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2023 Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South (CARES)
ISSN
2277-9760
eISSN
2321-0281
DOI
10.1177/22779760221145232
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article engages with and critiques dominant theories of political ecology. It takes the theory of ecologically unequal exchange (EUE) as the framework of critique. It assesses the claims of “fossil capitalism,” eco-modernism, extractivism, and degrowth, as well as the theories of “post-development.” It finds that with the exception of degrowth, none of them take imperialism or the global history of accumulation sufficiently seriously, and either displace transformative obligations wholly onto the South or adopt a framework which centers merely the agency of the Northern working class or a class-blind movement of movements. Instead, it proposes modifications of EUE based on the polarized nature of accumulation and waste production and distribution, and neocolonialism. It uses that framework to identify the antisystemic role of nature-reliant peripheral semi-proletarian classes, and from there reopens the debate on appropriate-scale industrialization along with ecological transformations of agriculture as paths to development in the twenty-first century.

Journal

Agrarian South: Journal of Political EconomySAGE

Published: Mar 1, 2023

Keywords: Agriculture; climate; degrowth; extractivism; imperialism; ecologically unequal exchange

References