Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter is the heart of the book. Thus this will be the key chapter in the book. BuddhismBuddhism does not recognize the full ontological status of the individualIndividual. Thus there is the question of how a theory that is based on the idea that the self is nonexistent could itself ground such a practical concept as privacy. The main idea is that privacy should be grounded, not on the metaphysical presupposition that the individual self fully exists as a subsistent metaphysical entity who deserves dignityDignity and respect, but on the idea that, even though the individual is not a fully subsisting metaphysical entity, their privacy should still be maintained because doing so will promote a set of goals and values that are desirable and are conducive to certain ends.]
Published: Dec 23, 2015
Keywords: Buddhism; Theory; Individual; Self; Metaphysics; Ontological status
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.