Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter highlights some of the theoretical and practical benefits of viewing corporate claimants to religious freedom as social actions, as opposed to rights-holding corporate persons. These benefits include movement beyond the divide between individual- and group-rights advocates, preservation of churches’ distinct normative value, and justification for degrees of governmental interference when religious liberty disputes arise. Of particular importance, the chapter demonstrates how groups—when viewed as verbs—can intelligibly be the subject of moral and legal analysis. On this point, Aquinas’s Summa theologiae and various court opinions (including from Judge Kent Jordan of the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals and from Justice Samuel Alito of the U.S. Supreme Court) come together to illuminate the practical moral use of Aquinas’s group ontology.]
Published: Sep 22, 2020
Keywords: Religious freedom; Religious institution; Churches; Corporate person; Voluntary association; Rights
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.