Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[As icons of science, microscopes occupy a place of prominence in debates about scientific realism and the reality of things invisible for the naked eye. Tapping into these, Chapter 7 examines how scientists perform explorative microanatomy of salmon lice exocrine glands. Through interactional analyses of scientists at work, it shows how mundane artifacts and sophisticated imaging techniques help practitioners create spatial reference and biological meaning from microscopic phenomena through a culturally shaped perceptual process. Spatial language, and a suite of semiotic resources, is deployed in intricate ways to reason and achieve consensus about such biological entities. The ethnography describes these cognitive practices. It looks at how representational states propagate through multimodal embodied interactions in front of the microscope, via transformations to scribbled paper notes, and get systematized and disseminated in scientific publications. From these analyses, low-level cognition like visual perception emerges as active processes enabled by a range of semiotic resources. But these only become noticeable when attending to what François Jacob once dubbed “night science”: the generative and inevitable mucking around that goes on backstage in the laboratory.]
Published: Jun 16, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.