Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter describes the process of medicalization of fear and anxiety which began in the early twentieth century and continues today. The radical biological approach to fear and anxiety promoted by contemporary psychiatry results in a fundamentalist approach to emotional disorders. Thus, committees of experts decide on new nosologies for fear and anxiety consisting of a limited set of diagnostic criteria accompanied by the design of biological models to explain their mechanism and treatment. A similar fundamentalism applies to extreme social constructionist approaches, which reduce fear and anxiety to by-products of socio-cultural forces, thereby ignoring personal attributes and the complex variability of contexts. As it is argued in this chapter, the dilemma of what counts as abnormal is not empirical but conceptual, and has not yet been satisfactorily addressed, let alone resolved. Thus, the so-called “age of anxiety” gives rise to therapeutic solutions that might better be characterised as part of ‘the age of fundamental reductionism.’]
Published: Apr 18, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.