Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Itzhak Benyamini, in his tantalizingly fresh reading of Genesis, writes plainly and elegantly what he describes as a “critical theology.” The focus is not exclusively on God—but it is primarily on the Bible’s leading character. What Benyamini means by “critical theology” is something fairly specific. He means a theology that takes a critical stance vis-à-vis the deity while, at the same time, seeking to understand what motivates God and what is accomplished, for better or worse, by what God does. His approach is both objective and subjective, like the deity himself. He is not interested in reconstructing or constructing a system, but rather, in deconstructing the deity’s behavior, as related in the biblical text, and examining the factors that may account for it. He is not so much looking for a method within the madness, so to speak, as for an explanation for the variously unpredictable and often complicated moves the deity makes. Why would God do what God does? What is in it for God?]
Published: Oct 2, 2016
Keywords: Theological Critique; Kierkegaard; Buberian Sense; Joyful Movement; Primordial Placement
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.