Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter provides evidence that the concept of a negative income tax (NIT) is well suited for implementing a minimum income from an economic point of view. A NIT-scheme does not only feature a guaranteed basic income for everyone but also increases the transparency of the tax-and-transfer system. However, by accumulating most (or all) social transfers in a new tax-and-transfer scheme, transfer payments cannot be sensitive to the individual’s specific situation anymore due to the general characteristics of the income tax.The chapter begins by clarifying the overall concept of a negative income tax. It is then shown that – from an economic perspective – a NIT-scheme is similar to the original idea of an unconditional basic income. Different types of NIT-schemes such as social-dividend-type and poverty-gap-type models are discussed and compared afterwards. The chapter ends with an overview of the few empirical studies that exist with regard to negative income tax plans.]
Published: Mar 2, 2016
Keywords: Transfer Payment; Subsistence Level; Minimum Income; Basic Income; Subsistence Minimum
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.