Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Since the introduction of digital technologies within traditional humanities education, a reconfiguration of both academic disciplines (that is the so-called posthumanities) and the subjectivities that such institutional bodies include as contexts for analysis (that is the so-called posthuman subject) are clearly in process. Such radical transformations provide a generative basis for a feminist genealogical analysis and critique. Under the pressures of this revisionary posthumanities imperative, new epistemological perspectives are emerging to reshape core values and re-inscribe the boundaries of the human. The disruptive knowledge communities of the new (digital) academy and their attendant revolutionary critical practices actively engage and promote convergent, hybrid and ontologically complex techno-human subjects, and together they re-think the role of the human in Humanities. I offer a context for understanding how feminist interventions in the field are connected to understanding and revealing the new material practices that traverse the boundaries between humans, technical agents, and others.]
Published: May 18, 2018
Keywords: posthumanites; digital humanties; materiality; affect; embodiment; performativity
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.