Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Chapter 1 Cecilia Åsberg and Rosi Braidotti Human nature is not the oxymoron we imagined it to be. In this new planetary age of the Anthropocene, defined by human-induced climatic, biological, and even geologi- cal transformations, we humans are fully in nature. And nature is fully in us. This was, of course, always the case, but it is more conspicuously so now than ever before: people are entangled in co-constitutive relationships with nature and the environment, with other animals and organisms, with medicine and technology, with science and epistemic politics. We live and die, play, thrive, and suffer by each other. Now is the time for greater scholarly attentiveness to such human and more-than-human worlds in sociocultural research, saturated as they are with ethical and political implications (van Dooren et al. 2016). For example, think of “mad cow” disease, where humans feeding cows with by-products from slaughtered sheep infected with the prionic dis- order “scrapie” in turn generates prion disorders in cows that get transmitted to human beef consumers through a series of transcorporeal (Alaimo 2010) gestures across species. We can think, too, of pollen allergies and their increased prevalence, or how hormone-like substances seep from plastics into infants
Published: May 18, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.