Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Genevieve Lloyd, in The Man of Reason, took issue with the idea that the Enlightenment’s portrait of reason as the engine of human progress is universal; rather, she says, very much like every portrait of reason from the Renaissance onwards, what the Enlightenment produced belonged to a fundamentally patriarchal framework. Reason, she says, is presented as neutral but is in fact always male, dominated by hard science and matter and excluding anything to do with emotions and human relationships.1 Moreover, by making the public space crucial to the attainment of intellectual and political maturity, the thinkers of the Enlightenment seemed to exclude those who did not have access to the sort of education they recommended, whose living space, far from being public, was limited to the home and whose companions were children and other homeworkers. “Man” was put on a pedestal, revered for his ability to reform using his reason, and “woman” was left at home.]
Published: Oct 10, 2015
Keywords: Eighteenth Century; Virtue Ethic; Feminist Perspective; Moral Sentiment; Arbitrary Power
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.