Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/a-formal-proof-of-a-paradox-associated-with-cohen-s-kappa-IY8xdtRbR7
References (45)
-
M. Warrens (2008)
On the Indeterminacy of Resemblance Measures for Binary (Presence/Absence) DataJournal of Classification, 25
-
A. Feinstein, D. Cicchetti (1990)
High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 43 6
-
W. Dou, Yuanyuan Ren, Qian Wu, Sumei Ruan, Yanping Chen, D. Bloyet, J. Constans (2007)
Fuzzy kappa for the agreement measure of fuzzy classificationsNeurocomputing, 70
-
(1977)
“Kappa Revisited,” -
I. Guggenmoos‐Holzmann (1996)
The meaning of kappa: probabilistic concepts of reliability and validity revisited.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 49 7
-
M. Potter (2008)
Resolving the paradoxes -
T. Byrt, T. Byrt, J. Bishop, J. Bishop, J. Carlin, J. Carlin (1993)
Bias, prevalence and kappa.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 46 5
-
M. Warrens (2008)
Bounds of Resemblance Measures for Binary (Presence/Absence) VariablesJournal of Classification, 25
-
W. Thompson, S. Walter (1988)
A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 41 10
-
J. Sim, C. Wright (2005)
The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.Physical therapy, 85 3
-
H. Kraemer, V. Periyakoil, A. Noda (2002)
Kappa coefficients in medical researchStatistics in Medicine, 21
-
H. Kraemer, V. Periyakoil, A. Noda (2004)
TUTORIAL IN BIOSTATISTICS Kappa coecients in medical research -
C. Lantz, E. Nebenzahl (1996)
Behavior and interpretation of the κ statistic: Resolution of the two paradoxesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49
-
L. Goodman (1991)
Measures, Models, and Graphical Displays in the Analysis of Cross-Classified DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 86
-
W. Vach (2005)
The dependence of Cohen's kappa on the prevalence does not matter.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 58 7
-
GH Hardy, JE Littlewood, G Pólya (1988)
Inequalities -
M. Warrens (2010)
Inequalities Between Kappa and Kappa-Like Statistics for k×k TablesPsychometrika, 75
-
S. Lipsitz, N. Laird, T. Brennan (1994)
Simple moment estimates of the κ-coefficient and its varianceApplied statistics, 43
-
M Aickin (1990)
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Agreement in the Constant Predictive Model, and Its Relation to Cohen’s KappaBiometrics, 26
-
D. Steinley (2004)
Properties of the Hubert-Arabie adjusted Rand index.Psychological methods, 9 3
-
R. Brennan, Dale Prediger (1981)
Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and AlternativesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 41
-
J. Purcell, Brocard Sewell, J. Sullivan, P. Hunt, G. Macdonald (1979)
Another Look at -
M. Warrens (2009)
k-Adic Similarity Coefficients for Binary (Presence/Absence) DataJournal of Classification, 26
-
J. Nelson, M. Pepe (2000)
Statistical description of interrater variability in ordinal ratingsStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 9
-
M. Warrens (2008)
On Similarity Coefficients for 2×2 Tables and Correction for ChancePsychometrika, 73
-
J. Mast (2007)
Agreement and Kappa-Type IndicesThe American Statistician, 61
-
D. Wackerly, D. Robinson (1983)
A more powerful method for testing for agreement between a judge and a known standardPsychometrika, 48
-
R. Bakeman, Duncan McArthur, Byron Robinson (2001)
Detecting Sequential Patterns and Determining Their Reliability With Fallible Observers -
LJ Hubert, P Arabie (1985)
Comparing PartitionsJournal of Classification, 2
-
M. Warrens (2008)
On Association Coefficients for 2×2 Tables and Properties That Do Not Depend on the Marginal DistributionsPsychometrika, 73
-
A. Eye, Maxine Eye (2008)
On the Marginal Dependency of Cohen’s κEuropean Psychologist, 13
-
A. Conger (1980)
Integration and generalization of kappas for multiple raters.Psychological Bulletin, 88
-
H. Kraemer (1979)
Ramifications of a population model forκ as a coefficient of reliabilityPsychometrika, 44
-
A. Ân, Andre Âs, P. Marzo
Delta: a New Measure of Agreement between Two Raters -
M. Aickin (1990)
Maximum likelihood estimation of agreement in the constant predictive probability model, and its relation to Cohen's kappa.Biometrics, 46 2
-
A. Andrés, Pedro Femia-Marzo (2008)
Chance-Corrected Measures of Reliability and Validity in 2 × 2 TablesCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 37
-
(1988)
Inequalities (2nd ed.) -
(2008)
Warrens (2008a) derives what association coefficients for 2×2 tables become kappa after correction for chance. Some bounds of the 2 × 2 kappa are presented in Warrens -
M. Warrens (2008)
On the Equivalence of Cohen’s Kappa and the Hubert-Arabie Adjusted Rand IndexJournal of Classification, 25
-
Rebecca Zwick (1988)
Another look at interrater agreement.Psychological bulletin, 103 3
-
J. Reed (1960)
Book Reviews : Visual Perceptual Abilities and Early Reading Progress by Jean Turner Goins, Supplementary Educational Monographs, #87, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958, Pp. x + 108Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20
-
Jacob Cohen (1960)
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 20
-
K. Gwet (2008)
Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 61 Pt 1
-
A. Andrés, P. Marzo (2004)
Delta: a new measure of agreement between two raters.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 57 Pt 1
-
D. Cicchetti, A. Feinstein (1990)
High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 43 6
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2010 by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
- Subject
- Statistics; Marketing ; Psychometrics; Signal, Image and Speech Processing; Bioinformatics; Pattern Recognition; Statistical Theory and Methods
- ISSN
- 0176-4268
- eISSN
- 1432-1343
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00357-010-9060-x
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Suppose two judges each classify a group of objects into one of several nominal categories. It has been observed in the literature that, for fixed observed agreement between the judges, Cohen’s kappa penalizes judges with similar marginals compared to judges who produce different marginals. This paper presents a formal proof of this phenomenon.
Journal
Journal of Classification – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 8, 2010