Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Geo-Economic Turn in Trade Policy?Intellectual Property Rights. EU and US Initiatives in the Asia–Pacific: Competition, Coordination or Duplication?

A Geo-Economic Turn in Trade Policy?: Intellectual Property Rights. EU and US Initiatives in the... [Promoting Intellectual property rights (IPRs) is a priority for the European Union and the United States. How have the EU and US pursued their strategies in the Asia-Pacific? This chapters compares their bilateral initiatives on IPRs across three strategies: treaty-making, coercion, and socialization. Through this analysis, we examine whether the EU and US’s bilateral actions indicate regulatory competition, coordination or duplication. We find that the overall tendency has been towards duplication, which raises questions about the reasons for this redundancy and its policy consequences. As the rise of bilateralism is not unique to IPRs, our findings have implications for global economic governance more generally.] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

A Geo-Economic Turn in Trade Policy?Intellectual Property Rights. EU and US Initiatives in the Asia–Pacific: Competition, Coordination or Duplication?

Part of the The European Union in International Affairs Book Series
Editors: Adriaensen, Johan; Postnikov, Evgeny
Morin, Jean-Frédéric; Cartwright, Madison
Springer Journals — Feb 5, 2022
Download PDF
28 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-geo-economic-turn-in-trade-policy-intellectual-property-rights-eu-gBJl8tss9b
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
ISBN
978-3-030-81280-5
Pages
97 –125
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-81281-2_5
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[Promoting Intellectual property rights (IPRs) is a priority for the European Union and the United States. How have the EU and US pursued their strategies in the Asia-Pacific? This chapters compares their bilateral initiatives on IPRs across three strategies: treaty-making, coercion, and socialization. Through this analysis, we examine whether the EU and US’s bilateral actions indicate regulatory competition, coordination or duplication. We find that the overall tendency has been towards duplication, which raises questions about the reasons for this redundancy and its policy consequences. As the rise of bilateralism is not unique to IPRs, our findings have implications for global economic governance more generally.]

Published: Feb 5, 2022

There are no references for this article.