Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The geo-economic turn in global policy-making has manifested itself not only in the rise of bilateral and regional free trade agreements (FTAs), but also in the more “strategic” design of these FTAs. States increasingly rely on FTA provisions like most-favoured nation (MFN) clauses to secure preferential market access and protect these gains against competitors. While MFN clauses are the cornerstone of the multilateral trade regime that limits possibilities for discrimination, they can also be employed on a bilateral and regional level to ensure that trade partners do not extend more favourable conditions to third parties in future FTA negotiations. To date, we find that the EU makes more frequent use of MFN clauses in FTAs than its trading partners in Asia—with the exception of China. While we observe no clear regional variants of MFN obligations, the trend to include MFN clauses in FTAs—especially in the services and investment chapters—reveals governments’ growing interest in safeguarding their exporters’ interests against third party competition in as many ways as possible. However, as we show, the strategic potential of MFN clauses remains uncertain as there is so far no evidence of active monitoring or enforcement of MFN obligations between trade partners.]
Published: Feb 5, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.