Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[This chapter studies the early modern debates on major ethical challenges that arose in palliative care and which are still at the heart of medical ethics today: The permissibility of intentionally shortening of a dying person’s life, of giving medicines to alleviate a patient’s suffering that might accelerate the approach of death and of forgoing the attempt to cure dying patients, at the risk that the occasional, only seemingly desperate patient could have been saved by more radical means. The chapter highlights the very lively – and so far virtually unknown – debate on popular practices like “pulling the pillow” which were explicitly designed to speed up the dying process. In conclusion, it examines attitudes towards truth-telling and shows that physicians, fearing negative effects on the body, were unanimous that patients should be kept ignorant of their fatal prognosis as long as possible.]
Published: Apr 29, 2017
Keywords: Eighteenth Century; Seventeenth Century; Unfavorable Prognosis; Sick Person; Tumor Tumor
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.