Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Being the subject of unequal treatment is commonly accepted as a stressful psychological experience; however, its physical impact is less well understood. According to recent scientific work in the field of neuroscience and epigenetics, stress and trauma that arise as a consequence of unequal treatment may have a biological as well as psychological impact. Further, those harms may be inherited by future generations. In this chapter, we argue that law should address the bodily effects of unequal treatment—what we call bioinequalities—and that to do so requires a shift in focus away from an individualised model of harm in favour of a model that understands the harm as shared among individuals, and across communities and generations. Bioinequality is experienced both at the intersection of and embedded within multiple sexed, raced, classed, and disabled (among others) identities and is interwoven with the social and material world, and the psychosocial environment. We challenge the individualising orientation of existing laws attempting to redress inequality, calling instead for a legal response that accounts for the intersectional and intergenerational harms of inequality.]
Published: Aug 6, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.