Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Rather than employ medical, pathologising, language and methods, we can and should use effective, scientific and understandable alternatives. Both of the major diagnostic systems contain the kernels of alternative systems for identifying and describing psychological phenomena and distress, and an improvement upon diagnosis would be simply to list a person’s experiences as described by that person. Such a straightforward phenomenological approach—the operational definition of our experiences—would enable our problems to be recognised (in both senses of the word), understood, validated, explained (and explicable) and initiate a plan for help. This would meet the universal call for appropriate, internationally recognised, data collection and shared language use and avoid the inadequacies of reliability and validity associated with traditional diagnoses. Such phenomenological codes offer a constructive, radical way forwards.]
Published: Sep 23, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.