Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[In this chapter, I offer two direct arguments—one consequentialist, the other nonconsequentialist—for the ultima facie moral permissibility of prostitution. One is a consequentialist argument and, as such, an argument wherein a claim regarding the moral permissibility of prostitution is derived from at least one consequentialist moral claim and no nonconsequentialist moral claims whatsoever. The other is a nonconsequentialist argument and, as such, an argument wherein a claim regarding the moral permissibility of prostitution is derived from at least one nonconsequentialist moral claim and no consequentialist moral claims whatsoever.]
Published: Jul 10, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.