Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Having covered a number of self-regarding harm-based arguments against recreational drug use, let us now turn our attention to other-regarding harm-based arguments against recreational drug use. But before doing so, it would be prudent to state at the outset that many instances of recreational drug use probably do not involve wrongfully harming others. As MacCoun and Reuter write, “[N]ot every incident of drug use harms others; in fact, the vast majority do not. Indeed, though this is difficult to quantify with existing data, it is likely that many if not most drug users never do wrongful harm to others as a result of their using careers— bearing in mind that the majority of these careers are limited in duration and intensity.”1 Accordingly, even if each of the following other-regarding harm-based arguments is sound, this will not entail that all instances of recreational drug use involve harm to others, much less that all instances of recreational drug use are morally impermissible.]
Published: Nov 30, 2015
Keywords: Moral Theory; Illegal Drug; Recreational Drug; Civil Disobedience; Legalism Argument
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.