Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Ubiquitous gaps between product efficacy in clinical trials and their real-world effectiveness suggest the need for evidence to bridge the research-to-practice divide. We conducted an innovative interdisciplinary project using a sequential mixed methods design to explore the social ecology of the acceptability of rectal microbicides (products in development to be applied to the rectal mucosa to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition), among young gay and bisexual men (GBM) and transgender women. The research was carried out in Thailand, which is the site of an explosive HIV epidemic among GBM. In collaboration with community-based organizations, we implemented focus groups to elicit in depth discussions of rectal microbicide preferences in the context of sexual practices, relationships, and sex work. We applied innovative data collection and data analytic methods, which allowed us to use focus group results to determine and understand rectal microbicide attributes modeled in a subsequent discrete choice experiment.]
Published: Jun 24, 2017
Keywords: HIV prevention; Rectal microbicide; Gay men; Transgender women; Thailand; Mixed methods
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.