Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[In agencies aiming at formulating recommendations to policymakers, such as the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), data collection – especially in qualitative methods – is often outsourced to academic teams or private companies, consultants, commercial agencies or research consultancies. This chapter focuses on comparing the approach to using focus groups taken by academic and non-academic research teams. More specifically it assesses: (i) the kind of expertise they bring to bear in responding to tenders; (ii) their skills with regard to working in several languages (important in a multi-lingual country such as Belgium); (iii) the proposed cost; (iv) their scientific approach; (v) their capacity to recruit participants; and (vi) their analysis and reporting skills. They were found to differ with regard to their specific strengths. Such collaboration takes time and requires a pragmatic focus (i.e. developing policy recommendations) rather than a theoretical focus. Thus, academic teams should not seek funding to pursue their own fundamental research, while non-academic teams would be well-advised to include a topic expert in their team.]
Published: Jun 24, 2017
Keywords: Outsourcing; Commercial teams; Policy context
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.