Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The Project P.A.T.H.S. is an innovative youth enhancement programme in Hong Kong utilizing different strategies to evaluate the project. In this chapter, unique features of the focus group studies conducted in the project are described. First, randomly selected programme implementers (36 groups with 177 workers) and programme participants (29 groups with 252 students) were recruited to join focus groups. Second, the CIPP Model of Daniel Stufflebeam focusing on context, input, process and product was used as a guiding evaluation framework. Third, ‘descriptors’ describing the programme and ‘metaphors’ that can represent the programme were used to understand the programme impact. Fourth, focus group data were analyzed by both quantitative and qualitative methods. Fifth, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the coding systems were examined. Sixth, aggregated pictures based on the responses of the workers and students were carried out. Finally, triangulation of the focus group evaluation with findings based on other evaluation methods was attempted. The insights gained from focus groups in the Project P.A.T.H.S. are discussed.]
Published: Jun 24, 2017
Keywords: Mixed methods; Descriptors; Metaphors
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.