Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The benefit of incorporating and embedding qualitative work in the development of complex interventions is now widely accepted. The MRC framework, for example, states that focus groups can be useful: in ‘defining the components of the intervention’ and in ‘defining the trial and intervention design’. In the case of ‘m-health’ interventions (behavioural interventions that incorporate the use of mobile technologies), this can include formative testing, pre-testing and piloting, through to implementation and evaluation. Despite this recognition, we question whether focus groups and data are being used to full advantage. Working chronologically through the stages of intervention development, we draw on relevant literature and our own experience, our main case study is the PROPELS trial (an mhealth project for people with pre-diabetes). We discuss how we used focus groups to develop an m-health support and maintenance arm, incorporating the use of tailored text messages and telephone support.]
Published: Jun 24, 2017
Keywords: Complex interventions; Mixed methods; Trials
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.