Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[The study and theorisation of editing has been fragmented. It is a circular problem: the practice is invisible and so ill-defined, but the lack of a clear identity sustains the invisibility. Names are not purely functional; they reflect cultural values and give substance to ideas that might otherwise remain intangible. The chapter pinpoints the reasons for the ambiguity and creates a new version of Bourdieu’s field of cultural value to show editing’s place in contemporary media production. Greenberg identifies patterns in the naming of acts of editing and offers an original working definition that allows us to identify them in a consistent way across different technologies, genres and time periods. From this generic definition of selecting, shaping and linking, and from descriptions by practitioners, a distinct sense of editing emerges.]
Published: Sep 4, 2018
Keywords: Conscious Acquaintance; Athila; Round Categories; Film Editing; Editorial Selection
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.